Lawsuit Raises Concerns Over Humanoid Robot Safety And Transparency

Gruendel alleges that the company’s Figure 02 humanoid robot demonstrated alarming strength during tests, capable of fracturing a human skull. He claims that his concerns about the robot’s power were met with dismissal, and he was subsequently fired for poor performance, according to Figure AI’s statement to CNBC. Gruendel’s lawyers have been contacted, but no response has been received.

The lawsuit raises crucial questions about the responsibility of humanoid robot developers to disclose the capabilities of their creations. This concern is echoed in a separate incident involving Engine AI, a Chinese robotics firm. The company’s CEO was recently knocked to the ground by its T800 robot, a model eerily reminiscent of the Terminator. Although the CEO was prepared for the stunt, wearing protective padding, the video of the incident leaves many wondering about the robot’s actual strength.

These parallel stories highlight the need for transparency in the development of humanoid robots. As these machines become increasingly sophisticated, it is essential that their creators provide clear information about their capabilities, ensuring that the risks associated with this technology are properly understood.