Wikipedia Blacklists Archive. Today: 695,000 Links Removed Amid Cybersecurity And Ethics Concerns

Key Takeaways
- Wikipedia editors blacklisted Archive.today due to cybersecurity risks.
- Allegations suggest the site converted reader computers into tools for DDoS attacks.
- Evidence indicates the archival service altered historical content.
- The ban affects approximately 695,000 links across the encyclopedia.
- Ownership of the service remains anonymous and hostile to public scrutiny.
I have often argued that Wikipedia represents the greatest achievement of the digital era.
It is a monument to human cooperation. But this monument requires a foundation of absolute trust. Editors recently demolished a bridge to Archive.today. This service hosts nearly 700,000 citations. It allows readers to bypass paywalls. It creates snapshots of shifting news cycles. However, the community discovered that the site converted browsers into weapons.
This is a massive breach of ethics.
The discussion page tells a story of technical betrayal. I noticed that editors found scripts designed to launch distributed denial-of-service attacks from the computers of unsuspecting readers. This turns a library into a launchpad for digital warfare. And the issues do not end with security.
Wikipedia contributors presented evidence that the operators altered archived pages. Stability is the soul of an archive. If the past becomes plastic, the citation loses its value. I suspect this realization forced the current blockade.
History repeats itself in the talk pages. The site faced a blacklist in 2013. It returned to favor in 2016. But the current situation involves a personal element.
Jani Patokallio attempted to identify the owner. He found a talented Russian developer operating from Europe. I find his subsequent experience chilling. The webmaster responded to a request for transparency with threats. He demanded the removal of investigation posts. Such aggression confirms the risks of opaque ownership.
Wikipedia chose to protect its audience from this instability. This decision reinforces the integrity of our shared knowledge. I believe the encyclopedia will emerge stronger. It has prioritized the safety of its readers over the convenience of a link.
Alternative viewpoints and findings: See here

NASA’s Latest Discovery Of ‘Ghost Galaxy’ Made Up Of 99%
Sam Altman Refutes AI Water Consumption Claims, Cites Energy Demand As Main Environmental Concern